Saturday, 2 May 2026

Nigeria’s next President already decided – Pastor Adeboye

By Olayinka Latona

02 May, 2026; 01:50pm

Pastor Enoch Adeboye, the General Overseer of the Redeemed Christian Church of God, RCCG, has said Nigeria’s next president had already been determined by God.

Pastor Adeboye said this while speaking at the workers’ meeting held at the Redemption City on the Lagos-Ibadan Expressway on Saturday.v

Adeboye said the outcome of the election is beyond human influence.

“The one that will rule has been decided by God before we were born. He knows the end from the beginning.

“God is not going to sit in heaven scratching His mighty head with His everlasting hand, saying who should rule Nigeria in 2027. It has been decided before the foundation of the world,” Adeboye told the congregation.

He urged worshippers to focus on their spiritual assignments: “Keep on praying, winning souls, and let your fruits abide. Face your business.”

Addressing recent comments by another preacher who described Adeboye, Bishop David Oyedepo, and Pastor William Kumuyi as “denominational fathers” rather than fathers of all Nigerian Christians, the RCCG leader agreed entirely.

PSG and Bayern in 'different world' to Premier League

Craig Nelson (BBC Sport Journalist)

2 hours ago

Paris St-Germain and Bayern Munich are competing in "different worlds" to Premier League teams, says Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta.

And the Spaniard believes the difference in attacking quality on show in the first two legs of the Champions League semi-finals is down to the 'freshness' of the players.

Ligue 1's leading side PSG edged out the German champions 5-4 in a thrilling tie at the Parc des Princes in Paris, while the Gunners ground out a 1-1 draw at Atletico Madrid.

Arteta says PSG and Bayern's star players were able to be fresher than the Gunners' tired attacking talent, which he believes is down to differing levels of competition they experience in their domestic leagues.

"To deliver that much quality you have to be very fresh, and the difference in the leagues and the way they are competing is night and day," said the Arsenal boss.

"You just have to see a lot of stats around it. We are comparing two different worlds."

Collectively, Arsenal's starting XI in their Champions League semi-final first leg have played 32,508 minutes this season - more than any of their rivals left in the competition.

Atletico's starting XI have played 31,701, compared with Bayern's 31,522 and PSG's 29,968.

Premier League and La Liga teams play 38 domestic matches each season, while Bundesliga and Ligue 1 sides play 34 domestic matches as their leagues are made up of 18 teams.

The Gunners' David Raya (4,140), Martin Zubimendi (4,096), Declan Rice (4,002) and William Saliba (3,774) were all in the top five, in terms of minutes played this season, out of the four starting line-ups.

While Rice, for example, has played 359 more minutes this season than England team-mate Harry Kane - almost equal to four whole matches.

"The quality of the two teams [PSG and Bayern], and especially the individual quality of players, I have never seen something like this," added Arteta.

"But when I look at the amount of minutes and the freshness of those players, I'm not surprised.

"How many players were available [for PSG and Bayern]? All of them, at their very best. That's the most important thing."

Are Premier League teams at a disadvantage?

Image source,Getty Images

Image caption,England captain Harry Kane and Ballon d'Or winner Ousmane Dembele both scored in Tuesday's nine-goal Champions League semi-final first leg between Paris St-Germain and Bayern Munich

There is no doubt that PSG and Bayern's attacking players lived up to their billing in Tuesday night's thrilling encounter.

Georgian winger Khvicha Kvaratskhelia scored twice for defending champions PSG, who also had Ballon d'Or winner Ousmane Dembele on the scoresheet.

Bayern countered with goals from leading scorer Kane and top attacking duo Michael Olise and Luis Diaz, all three of whom signed from Premier League clubs.

In contrast, Arsenal were missing injured German forward Kai Havertz and lost key creative midfielder Martin Odegaard midway through the second half of their match in Madrid with injury.

England winger Bukayo Saka, meanwhile, started on the bench after spending a month out with an Achilles injury - he also missed eight games earlier in the season with hip and hamstring problems.

There have been concerns raised in the past by Premier League managers about how fixtures are scheduled around key European fixtures.

Ligue 1 recently agreed a PSG request to postpone a match against Lens that was scheduled between the two legs of their Champions League quarter-final against Liverpool.

When asked about potential help from the Premier League schedulers, Arteta said: "If they can do that, that would be great."

Arsenal's title rivals, Manchester City, recently held discussions with the Premier League over their fixture scheduling after matches had to be postponed due to their participation in both domestic cup finals.

Those two matches - at home to Crystal Palace (13 May) and away to Bournemouth (19 May) - have since been rearranged. As a result, City will now play three games in seven days, either side of their FA Cup final against Chelsea on Saturday, 16 May.

Australia wants to become the first country to eliminate a cancer - can it?

02 May, 2026; 01:00pm

Tabby WilsonSydney

Nathan Morris/Australian Broadcasting Corporation

Chrissy Walters' daughter is part of a generation Australia hopes will grow up without the burden of cervical cancer

Six months after finally giving birth to her first child, following a years-long struggle to conceive, Chrissy Walters was told her daughter would likely grow up without her.

Walters had suffered a major bleed while at home in Toowoomba - a small city two hours inland of Brisbane - and several hospital visits, doctor appointments and biopsies later, the then 39-year-old was handed an advanced cervical cancer diagnosis.

"I just said to [my husband] Neil… there has been a huge mistake," Walters recalls.

She's now spent more than a decade undergoing treatments - both debilitating and incredibly invasive - but the cancer has spread to other parts of her body. Her doctors say her diagnosis is now terminal.

"I would never wish [this] on my worst enemy," she says.

Her daughter, now 12, has grown up with the disease omnipresent in her life - Walters says the family was having frank conversations about dying when she was as young as three.

But in 2026, her daughter has reached the age when Australia begins vaccinating children in its bid to eliminate the disease that will eventually take her mother's life.

The country is on track to do that within a decade, and is now racing other nations to become the first in the world to eliminate a form of cancer.

A two-pronged approach to elimination

It's a scene familiar to many who've attended an Australian high school: a long line of fidgety 12 and 13-year-olds take their seat on a plastic chair, one by one, assured by a nurse that the needle will only hurt for a moment.

Minutes later, they head back to class, sporting a circular plaster on their upper arm.

There are three vaccinations offered to high school students as part of the National Immunisation Programme, including the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine.

Though HPV can have no symptoms, and even disappear without treatment, some high-risk strains can develop into cervical cancer, the fourth most common cancer in women worldwide.

Fortunately, it is also one of the few causes of cancer people can be vaccinated against.

University of Sydney

Professor Karen Canfell is a pioneer of cervical cancer research

A global leader in cervical cancer control, Professor Karen Canfell has seen the impact of the disease both in and beyond Australia. The epidemiologist tells the BBC it feels like "everyone has a mother or a sister or a grandmother that's been impacted by cervical cancer".

But in 2006, in a lab at the University of Queensland, there was a breakthrough.

After decades of research, Australian scientists had developed a pioneering new jab, named Gardasil, which could prevent HPV - and it had been approved by the medicines regulator. One year later, Australia became the first country in the world to roll out a national vaccination programme.

The vaccine gave global health experts hope for a future without the cancer, with modelling designed by Canfell and the World Health Organisation (WHO) charting a path to elimination.

"Public health innovations in Australia sort of gave a general exemplar for WHO to follow," says Canfell.

Along with its broad vaccination programme - which in 2013 was expanded to include boys, who can be carriers of the virus - it also has a high-grade screening scheme.

In 2017, Australia was one of the first countries to transition from a pap smear to a more sensitive HPV-based cervical screening, which is only required every five years.

The nation was also one of the first to offer women the option of collecting a sample themselves - which the government has described as a "game-changer", particularly for those apprehensive about pelvic exams, or people with time and healthcare access barriers.

Is Australia on track?

In practical terms, eliminating cervical cancer as a public health issue in Australia does not mean it would become a thing of the past entirely - scientists define elimination as fewer than four cases of cervical cancer per 100,000 people.

Assessors have published a report stating the country is on track to meet its target of eliminating the cancer by 2035 - and it may even get there early.

Since 1982, when records began, incidence and mortality rates for cervical cancer in Australia have both halved.

Most promisingly, the most recent data from 2021 shows, for the first time, there were no cervical cancer cases diagnosed in women under the age of 25.

"It's not all women of all ages yet, but you can see that concept of elimination being realised," Canfell said.

Cervical cancer rates in Australia

Australia currently has about 6.3 new cases per 100,000 women. Vaccination of girls under 15 hovers just over 80%, and 85% of women in the most critical age group have been screened for cervical cancer.

But Canfell warns the progress report does show a slight decline in vaccination rates - particularly among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, who continue to face greater barriers to healthcare access and worse health outcomes than the broader population.

Rates of cervical cancer are twice as high for Indigenous women, and they're also more than three times as likely to die from the disease.

"They're often detected at a later stage of cancer than non-Indigenous women," says Dr Natalie Strobel, an epidemiologist specialising in disease prevention in Indigenous communities.

Research has indicated that, on the current trajectory, cervical cancer will be eliminated for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women 12 years later than the national 2035 target.

Strobel and her research partner Jocelyn Jones also say vaccine hesitancy in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, the rising cost of medical services and children missing school - and thus, the vaccine - are other factors which could hinder Australia reaching its goal.

"There's not a lot of a concerted effort to get them back in if they've missed it... The onus is very much on families to get their child caught up on that vaccine," Jones explains, adding that many don't realise it is free.

Expense is also a barrier to Australia's success being replicated in low and middle-income nations, who might not have the resources or the healthcare systems to support the push to elimination, researchers say.

Canfell and her team have tried to convince governments cervical cancer elimination is a worthwhile investment, which will save them money in the long run.

Beyond saving lives and having an "incredible societal impact", women can remain part of the workforce and economic productivity is increased. At risk of sounding insensitive, there is evidence of a "return on investment", Canfell says.

Australia - through public money and philanthropy - is now helping its neighbours, countries like Vanuatu and Papua New Guinea, pursue elimination too.

However global cuts to foreign aid - which supports HPV vaccination in low-income nations - have had significant impact; in March 2025, US President Donald Trump announced he would end support for Gavi, an alliance that buys critical jabs for developing countries.

"To say the obvious thing, we are obviously lucky to be in a high-income country where we have a form of universal healthcare and access for all," Canfell says.

Global ramifications

Walters says dealing with cervical cancer has felt like "a full-time job", but one you pay dearly to have.

There's endless appointments, all sorts of side effects from having your body "nuked like Chernobyl", fatigue from having to constantly advocate for yourself, and massive financial pressure - despite subsidies from Australia's universal healthcare system.

But there's great hope her experience may soon become something of the past.

"There's sort of a good-natured, almost race emerging between some countries about who will reach elimination first," Canfell says.

Sweden and Rwanda have both set ambitious targets of eliminating cervical cancer by 2027, separately launching accelerated vaccination and screening programmes, though both countries are lagging behind key milestones. The UK also has a goal of eradicating cervical cancer by 2040, but has faced similar struggles - both HPV vaccination and cervical screening coverage have declined over recent years.

Canfell emphasises that although there are excellent examples of infectious disease control, such as HIV prevention and management, the approach to cervical cancer has been unique and a true global effort.

"It's the first time that the WHO, and globally, we've said we're going to eliminate a cancer," says Canfell.

"That's actually a new concept for cancer."

US to cut troop levels in Germany by 5,000 amid Trump spat with Merz

RealAfrica News

02 May, 2026, 12:00pm

The US Defence Department plans to withdraw 5,000 troops from Germany, amid a spat between President Donald Trump and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz over the war with Iran.

The decision comes a day after Trump criticised Merz, who suggested the US had been "humiliated" by Iranian negotiators.

The US has a significant military presence in Germany, with more than 36,000 active duty troops assigned to bases across the country as of last December.

Defence Minister Boris Pistorius told the German Press Agency in Berlin that "the presence of American soldiers in Europe, and particularly in Germany, is in our interest and in the interest of the US".

At the same time, he made it clear that the decision did not come as a surprise.

The fact that the US would withdraw troops from Europe and also from Germany "was foreseeable", he said.

In social media posts on Thursday, Trump said Merz was "doing a terrible job" and had "problems of all kinds", including on immigration and energy. Trump has also suggested pulling US troops from Italy and Spain.

In a statement, Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said the order about US troops in Germany had come from Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth.

"This decision follows a thorough review of the Department's force posture in Europe and is in recognition of theatre requirements and conditions on the ground," he said.

"We expect the withdrawal to be completed over the next six to twelve months."

Trump, a longtime critic of the Nato alliance, has been lashing out at allies over their refusal to participate in operations to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

Trump tells Congress ceasefire means he does not need their approval for Iran war

Asked on Thursday whether he would also consider pulling US troops from Italy and Spain, Trump responded: "I probably will - look, why shouldn't I?"

"Italy has not been of any help to us and Spain has been horrible," he added, criticising them for their response to the war in Iran.

"In all cases they said, 'I don't want to get involved.'"

Merz told university students earlier this week that "the Americans clearly have no strategy" and he could not see "what strategic exit" they might choose.

"The Iranians are obviously very skilled at negotiating, or rather, very skilful at not negotiating, letting the Americans travel to Islamabad and then leave again without any result," he said.

He added that the "entire nation" was being "humiliated" by the Iranian leadership.

In response, Trump took to his platform Truth Social, where he said Merz thought it was "OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon" and "doesn't know what he's talking about".

"No wonder Germany is doing so poorly, both Economically, and otherwise!" the post read.

The RealAfrica has contacted the German embassy in Washington for comment.

The US military deployment in Germany is by far its biggest in Europe, with about 12,000 troops in Italy and a further 10,000 in the UK.

Many are stationed at Ramstein Air Base outside the south-western German city of Kaiserslautern.

Trump has previously proposed US troop reductions in Germany, but they have so far not come in to effect.

Only Japan hosts a larger US troop presence.

In 2020, a proposal to move 12,000 US troops from Germany either to other Nato countries in Europe or back to the US was blocked by Congress and then reversed by President Joe Biden.

At the time, Trump had accused Germany of being "delinquent" because its military spending was well below Nato's target of 2% of economic output (GDP).

But that has changed dramatically under the Merz government.

Germany is projected to spend €105.8bn (£91bn) in 2027 - with total defence expenditure next year set to reach 3.1% of GDP.

Last year, the US decided to reduce its troop presence in Romania, as part of Trump's plan to shift the focus of US military commitment from Europe to the Indo-Pacific region.

Romania's defence minister said the decision was made after Hegseth conveyed to the Romanians that they needed to pay more attention to their own defence.

The decision was met with disapproval from some of Trump's fellow Republicans in Congress, and concern from other Eastern European countries wary of Russia.

Additional reporting by Bethany Bell

Trump says US studying troop cuts in Germany, as spat with Merz intensifies

US will reduce its troops on Nato's eastern flank, Romania says

Subscribe Us